Is education a waste of time?

I was idly listing out all the supposed “children’s books” that deal with fascism or totalitarianism in one form or another, and as the list grew longer I wondered why this lesson is never learned. Maybe my post-war generation was just especially saturated with it, like war movies.

Then I remembered how little I can recall of the vast swathes of education and reading I’ve been exposed to. In fact, my title is probably the start of a Socratic dialogue in Plato somewhere. As in, is there any point in paying these peripatetic teachers for their supposed knowledge and subsidizing their drinking at banquets? Maybe I do remember something about it.

Here’s a beginning list:

1. Animal Farm, Orwell. “Some animals are more equal than others.”
2. The Harry Potter books. Hello, I loved the Weasley brothers creating a swamp in Hogwarts as part of their Resistance to Umbrage. Resistance theatre.
3. A Wrinkle in Time. L’Engle. I don’t have to spell this out, do I?
4. The Tripod books by John Christopher, a dystopian’s dystopian.
5. Yes, yes, Fahrenheit 451 one of my least favorite of Bradbury’s books. A fine writer reduced to agitprop. Not really a kids’ book, but a godsend for teachers since it has a “message.”
6. I’d add Lord of the Flies if it had a coherent point, but I think it was simply an excellent example of misanthropy, appealing to those who find children nasty, brutish and short.
7. Hunger Games, of course, although that might be a bit reductionist.

I’ll leave you to guess why I’ve been thinking about totalitarianism, but I will say I’ve been having ongoing conversations in my head with my WWII and Korean veteran father (no longer with us) who was a keen reader of Western world vs. Soviets espionage and thriller books, especially those set during WW II. In fact you could argue that one proximate cause for my existence was McCarthyism and the hysterical fear of communists during the 50s which prevented the State Department from hiring anyone while my father was waiting to hear back about his Foreign Service application. Instead of doing sneaky things at embassies, he ended up marrying my mother and embarking on a completely different career. But he never lost his interest in that east/west conflict and the realization that we had enemies that could annihilate our country. I wonder if he would find our current situation more comprehensible than I do, having been schooled in the genre that deals with KGB-generated disinformation campaigns and tactics. Yeah, Dad, you were right, I should’ve paid more attention.

(For those of you who didn’t waste your impressionable youth reading Mad magazine, the above images are from Spy vs. Spy, a regular feature providing an intellectual challenge similar to that of Wiley Coyote and Road Runner.)

Tesser well

Sigh. This seems to be another time-travel book that no one calls science fiction. It is wearing to have all that barbed wire to climb over, getting in and out of the genre ghetto. Some days you just get so tired of the snags in your socks.

But the ghetto doesn’t apply to kids’ books, right? Subvert them when they’re young, mwa ha ha, although they seem to finally be calling A Wrinkle in Time a science fiction book. Perhaps it was just to justify the dayglo makeup on Oprah in the movie.

Speaking of a Wrinkle in Time, my next middle-grade adventure is a humdinger of an homage to that very novel. In When you Reach Me by Rebecca Stead, Miranda carries her favorite book with her everywhere, and that just happens to be Wrinkle. In fact, she refuses to read anything else. (Whoa there, Missy, there were sequels, too.) Another main character in the book figures out how to tesser in time, and that fact is central to the plot and the novel’s structure. But is that what the book is about? What a good question!

No. At its heart, it’s about friendship, at that age where friendship is everything, at least among girls. How you treat your friends, how you betray your friends, how you do or do not trust other people, whether your pride prevents you from helping a friend— that’s what it’s about. But the time-travel makes it all so much more amazing, in a 12 monkeys kind of way. (If you haven’t seen 12 monkeys, go see it now. I’ll wait.)

I am late to the party in heaping praise on When You Reach Me but it deserves another heap. Anything that can get me to spend a Saturday afternoon re-reading almost the entire book to notice the clues I missed before, and working out whether the ending would have completely changed the future or not, deserves its popularity, even if it didn’t have to spend time locked up in the scifi ghetto with the other deserving books. The deft handling of clues, and the revelation of bits and pieces of the mystery was masterful. I would dearly love to know how the author kept track of when she would reveal what. If you want to learn how to write a mystery, this book is a great model of the controlled release of information.

I love this book for so many reasons, but mostly because the author played fair with the reader and gave us all the information we needed to work out what was happening, before the narrator apparently did. If you paid attention, you even noticed when the main character’s self-centered behavior may have been partially responsible for the almost-tragedy, that was a tragedy nonetheless. See how I am trying not to create a spoiler here? Whew.

Despite this, the reader is rooting for the MC, but the complexity of motives and emotions is what’s so satisfying and plausible. I’m going to make a philosophical pronouncement and say that girls can be pretty mean at that age, especially in the throes of that “you’re not my best friend anymore” warfare.

For the record, I completely choked up at the unexpected dedication in a book Miranda receives as a gift. I admit it, okay?

This was a beautiful book that makes you both think and feel, and it’s quite clear why it won the Newbery Honor Medal.

Now please, Ms. Stead, share your plot chart with us?

For extra credit, a youtube video in which Dr. Tyson explains dimensions and tesseracts in a way which lets me (and everyone else) off the hook for having so much trouble trying to visualize this in high school geometry class. Tesseracts – Neil deGrasse Tyson. Thank you, Dr. Tyson, for helping me let go of geometry trauma.

For extra, extra credit (you nerds know who you are) if you like time travel books, I can recommend the Ijon Tichy books by Samuel Lem. Start with Memoirs of a Space Traveler and once you’ve had a taste you can move on to the rest. Not only is the science right, but the books are quite funny.

My essay is up at “My Favorite Bit”

Mary Robinette Kowal is very kindly hosting my essay about my favorite bit in The Third Kind of Magic on her website. The essay is about how certain essays in Le Guin’s Cheek by Jowl helped me understand what I was trying to do, enabling me to finish it.

The only time I had a conversation with Ms. Le Guin, at a book signing, we coincidentally talked about dragons. It was after a panel at a Book Expo in SF and for reasons I can’t precisely remember, the audience was not best pleased by what she had said about dragons in other books. (I suspect she was implying Smaug had barely scratched the surface of what dragons could be, which would hardly be controversial nowadays, so it was probably just the idea of criticizing the Master…)

The full essay is here.

Let me know what you think.